similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jes.al

Jes alternatives & similar sites

About · Jesal Gadhia — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
felix-seifert.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	About Me – Felix Seifert	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bafna.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	About me \| Rohan Bafna	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onthestack.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	On The Stack - Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
epeec-project.eu ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Epeec-Project - Blog about tools to accelerate programming in scientific industries	European Union en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bagnoli.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Carlo Bagnoli	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lantran.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Lan Tran - About	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alexkondov.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Alex Kondov - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
badrooki.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	BadRooki \| Free Dev Tools, Tech Tips & Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
torxjs.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home · torxjs/torx Wiki · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
totorewa.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	totorewa (Totorewa) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lcullen.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Luke Cullen \| Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
toshstack.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	ToshStack – Programming & Tech Engineering Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
samuelolaegbe.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Samuel Olaegbe \| Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lawver.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Ultranormal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1lubo.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	1lubo — Java · Rust · Bitcoin · Nostr	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badboi.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	BadBoi.dev \| My name is John. I’m a software engineer who lives in The Bay. I do mostly frontend stuff for my job, but I like tinker with systems programming and other lower level things for fun. I’m currently interested in learning about Rust. I enjoy running, cycling, and eating.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
threedevsandamaybe.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Three Devs and a Maybe: Weekly(ish) podcast on all things software development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badykov.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Kraken of Thought	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.