similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jennifer.dev

Jennifer alternatives & similar sites

The Architecture of Us: Engineering Trust — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
massa-app.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	MAS — Architecture & Engineering Project Management	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simpsoff.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Andrew Simpson - Mobile Engineering Lead / Mobile Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jamesfrommontana.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	An engineering blog for the rest of us	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skof.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	skof.dev — Digital Architect, Engineering Clarity	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
boosteng.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Boost Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thezeropattern.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Zero Pattern \| The Architecture of Reality and Failure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aetherial.tech ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Aetherial \| Engineering the Sublime	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sinmar.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	SINMAR — Engineering the Future of Firefighter Survival	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jblume.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jakob Blume — Software Engineer & Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
janbeck.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Science And Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
russellsystems.eu ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	russell systems – systems architecture for architecture & engineering	European Union en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamklockars.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Adam Oscar Klockars — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boringengineer.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Boring Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jamesrarthur.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	James R. Arthur \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dhanawada.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	N.R Dhanawada - Solutions Architect & Platform Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thetrustgroupsolutions.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Mission-Critical Software Engineering \| The Trust Group	GH~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
memeticengineering.ai ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Memetic Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dpe.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Home of Developer Productivity Engineering (DPE)	en	technology-and-computing WordPress Spree Commerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.