similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jeffreythor.com

Jeffreythor alternatives & similar sites

Jeffrey Thor — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
normansteger.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Script Terror by Norman Steger	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reijn.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Niels Reijn	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
stefansubich.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Stefan Subich	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5tigerjelly.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	My name is Chris	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
stdfox.me ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	stdfox	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akobor.me ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	@akobor	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emptytheory.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	eMpTy Theory — iOS & mobile development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
manuka.love ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Anna McPhee — Author of What Machines Can't Replace	en	technology-and-computing	robots llms ai humans	emailphone	none
nlog.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Solrin Park	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexjeffries.me ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Alex Jeffries	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
namanbytes.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Naman Kumar \| Innovating Tomorrow’s Tech	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
steeman.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Software Engineer, Developer and Technology Enthusiast	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ftraxler.me ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Florian Traxler-Palir	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myowncommonsense.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	My Own Common Sense	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whalequench.club ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Speaking to Computers - whale quench	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5starsoftware.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	5 Star Software \| Discover Reliable Tech Solutions — Get Started Today	United States~ en	software-and-applications Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
embedded-synergy.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nevinsky.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Alexey Nevinsky \| Software Engineering Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.