similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jdwk.com

Jdwk alternatives & similar sites

JDWK — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
akshatkhandelwal.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Akshat Khandelwal \| SRE Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sspn.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SSPN Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d2synergy.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Synergy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nebelskyi.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Nebelskyi - AQA	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystalrazorback.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Razorback	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marjanaafrinoni.link ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Marjana Afrin Oni \| Khulna \| Mangrove Institute of ...	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
testautomationguide.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Test Automation Guide \| Test Automation Guide	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stas-rg.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	STAS-RG	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
zoepadgett.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Zoe Padgett	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 3
marlow.quest ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Ash Marlow	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cwilbzz.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	cwilbzz	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benfranzi.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Ben Franzi ✌️	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whataboutseth.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	whataboutseth - Creating Smarter Solutions Through Innovation and Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cryptomation.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Gain easy access to a sea of crypto data \| CryptoMation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearing.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Joshua Dearing	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kd7uiy.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	The Making of a Ham	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keyit.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Link Shortener	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
test-automation-experts.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Test Automation Experts \| Test Automation Experts	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.