similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jdssv.org

Jdssv alternatives & similar sites

Journal of Data Science, Statistics, and Visualisation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
coreybrier.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Statistical Methods and Data Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
null-hypothesis.co.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Null Hypothesis \| The Journal Of Unlikely Science	United Kingdom en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samira-hamza.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Samira Portfolio \| Science journalist	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lupinesciencevisuals.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lupine Science Visuals – Scientific Illustrations for Researchers, Organizations, and Companies	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaryarajesh.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Aarya R(x) – Dreaming in Diagnostics: An Aspiring Doctor's Take on Science, Study, and Self.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
britishscienceassociation.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	British Science Association	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssmwi.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Creation Science Society of Milwaukee	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thevedscience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Ved Science Publication	en	science Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcfns.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS)	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mds3-coe.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Center for Materials Data Science for Stockpile Stewardship	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cost.eu ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	COST \| European Cooperation in Science and Technology	European Union en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corrsin.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Corrsin \| Operational Memory for Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
csef-colo.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Colorado State Science Fair, Inc	en	science Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4dinternationaljournal.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - 4D International Journal	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquillaninstitute.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The McQuillan Institute - Science, Technology, and the Human Future	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcrsa.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Mid-Continent Regional Science Association	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thought-web.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lab Tools : Nano-Science, Nano-Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation and Software Design.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.