similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jchendricks.com

Jchendricks alternatives & similar sites

JC Hendricks | Experience Design Consultant — LBE, Themed Entertainment & Sports Venues — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
the-ether.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Ether – Experience Design Consultancy	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demoine.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	DeMoine Lovelace \| Senior Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kentonite.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Kentonite \| Strategic, Creative, Product & Experience Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alinear.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	alinear _ experience design and identity.	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zoeywu.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	LXD Portfolio — Learning Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fsb-ae-blog.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Design Matters \| Experience the Evolution of Design	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearpaolo.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Paolo Benvenuto, Experience Designer, California	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benlevin.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ben Levin, Experience Strategy and Design	en	design Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
n-plusone.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	n+1 design consulting	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marsam.art ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Marsam — Architectural Design Consultancy	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
startwithfeel.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	experience design, visual development, concept design, Festival design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tensixpines.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ten Six Pines \| Experiential Design & Installation	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
macchione.design ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mike Macchione - Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
willslatondesign.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Will Slaton Design \| User Experience	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garriganknoll.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	GarriganKnoll \| Product & Design Consulting	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenguzik.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ken Guzik - User Experience Designer	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
relaylab.ai ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Relay Studios \| Digital Experience Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beniyorohan-design.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	BY Design — Creative Consultancy	en	design	robots llms ai humans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.