similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jbeasleydesigns.com

Jbeasleydesigns alternatives & similar sites

J Beasley Designs – Artist and sticker shop — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Fine Art →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
rachelchurchportfolio.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Rachel Church – Artist and Educator	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
robinlevertonart.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Robin Leverton – Artist and Technologist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bramdemos.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Bram de Mos – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jessgonzales.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jess Gonzales – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rachelenglandart.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Rachel England – artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meaghanrobertsartist.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Meaghan Roberts – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jessdavies.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jess Davies – artist printmaker	en	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annalina.art ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Annalina – Artist website	en	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amitizack.art ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Amit Izack – ARTIST	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theopapandreopoulos.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Theo Papandreopoulos – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kylelabinsky.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kyle Labinsky – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
breanncarlucci.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Breann Carlucci – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreacarvalho.art ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Andrea Carvalho – Artista	en	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rachfeatherston.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	RACH FEATHERSTON – Artist	en	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenniferrodgersart.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Jennifer S. Rodgers \| Artist and Art Educator	en	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amyelizabeth.design ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Colorado Artist \| Amy Elizabeth Design	en	fine-art Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theholborngroup.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	The Holborn Group – Artist Collective	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jazminwilkins.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Jazmin Wilkins – Visual Artist	en	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.