similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jayro.dev

Jayro alternatives & similar sites

Jay Ovalle - Infrastructure Engineer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
torwell.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Torwell LLC — Infrastructure Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xlunarhash.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	0xlunarhash \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blksheepos.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	BLKSHEEPOS - Creator Profile Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanjaybaskaran.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sanjay Kumar Baskaran - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
felixgodbout.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Felix Godbout — Infrastructure Architect \| Own Your Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuel-mount.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Mount — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
blockmachine.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	blockmachine \| Decentralized RPC Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
coralidy.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Fast Scalable Infrastructure Stacks - Avnox.com	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oolys.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Oolys \| API Infrastructure for Financial Services	en	technology-and-computing Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lashford.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Relative Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanleigh.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Leigh \| Software Engineer	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4thechain.earth ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	4TheChain - Blockchain infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blockbrainers.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Blockbrainers - High-Performance Systems & Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adams.place ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Adam Boudjemaa \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blankstate.ai ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Blankstate \| The Sensing Infrastructure for Interactions	en	technology-and-computing Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blockzen.io ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Blockzen Digital — Crypto Execution & Solver Infrastructure	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandovalcarlos.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Carlos Sandoval — Lead Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1x.engineer ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	1x Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.