similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jayconrod.com

Jayconrod alternatives & similar sites

Integration tests are best tests — jayconrod.com — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
scrolltest.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Software Testing & Automation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakubsobolewski.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Jakub Sobolewski — R & Shiny, Test-Driven Software Development	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
developeraspirations.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Aspirations of a Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
marlenacompton.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Marlena's Blog – Write — Test — Code (opinions are my own)	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wearexplorer.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	WE ARE XPLORER	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markinfo.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Computer Information and Projects	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jannusdorfer.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Jannus Dorfer — Full-Stack Developer & Automation Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culmination.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Culmination.org – You are what you've become.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cukesalad.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Cucumber based testing recipes – Cucumber/Gherkin based black box testing for different kinds of applications	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skek.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	example test 123	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1lubo.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	1lubo — Java · Rust · Bitcoin · Nostr	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonpscott.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jason P. Scott's Blog — Stories from a software engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developingintest.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Developing In Test \| Nathan Thompson \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
jareteduardo.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jaret Eduardo — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jake-moore.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jake Moore — Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culsma.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Culsma Documentation \| Culsma	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
javvad.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jawad Alsahlani — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adoptingerlang.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Introduction \| Adopting Erlang	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.