similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jasperdebie.dev

Jasperdebie alternatives & similar sites

Jasper de Bie | Full Stack Engineer and agile advocate — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jamiewhite.dev ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Jamie White \| Full Stack Engineer / Co-Founder of Piing	en	technology-and-computing Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahmedali.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Ahmed Ali \| Full Stack Blockchain Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jake-alagel.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jacob Alagel \| Full-Stack Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamestsetsekas.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	James Tsetsekas \| Full Stack Developer & Bitcoin Engineer	en	technology-and-computing WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jatinsri.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jatin Shrivastav — Full-Stack Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakemmarsh.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jake Marsh \| full-stack product engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jayykatta.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jay Katta \| Full Stack \| DevOps	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jayykatta.app ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jay Katta \| Full Stack \| DevOps	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonfoster.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Simon Foster \| Full-Stack Engineer & Technical Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
james-hankins.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	James Hankins — Full-Stack Engineer · Writer · Product	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mariom.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mario Mantilla - Software Engineer and Social Impact	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasoncooper.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jason Cooper - Engineering Manager & Full-Stack Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
wawrusch.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Martin Wawrusch - Software Engineer and Entrepreneur	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbrieu.info ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jean-Baptiste Rieu \| Software Engineer and Product Manager	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agileanalytics.cloud ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Agile Analytics — Stop losing 5K per engineer on hidden delays	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1mydress.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jay Bharat 9844542127 Software Engineer and Model	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
massafolio.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Massa Coulibaly — Full-Stack & Forward-Deployed Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janbeck.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Science And Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.