Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jasonpartee.com

Jason Partee · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
87match
georgecarter88.com
George Carter
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
keithveverka.com
Keith Veverka
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
85match
larajnance.com
Lara J Nance
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
jmulrooney.com
J. Mulrooney
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
jnwoodbooks.com
J N Wood
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
85match
hauntingsonharehill.com
August Hare
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
hawkswoodbooks.com
Clive Hawkswood
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
85match
hazelpunk.com
Hazel Punk
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
85match
balinknight.com
Larry Pearson
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
booksorwheels.com
Melissa A Dingman
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
85match
bookjester.com
Solomon Glaukos
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
cecewhittakerbooks.com
Cece Whittaker
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
85match
mareechurchauthor.com
Maree Church
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
kennethdrakebooks.com
Kenneth Drake
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
78match
laperry.com
L.A. Perry
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
jjerue.com
J. Jerue
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
78match
greenvinebooks.com
Faye Green
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
admatsonstories.com
A.D. Matson
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.