similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jask.dev

Jask alternatives & similar sites

Jask | Lead Researcher & Builder — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0xmaruf.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	0xmaruf — Security Researcher & Bug Bounty Hunter	en	information-and-network-security WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonachkardiab.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Cybersecurity Portfolio \| Full-Stack Developer & Security Researcher	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adnanthekhan.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Adnan Khan - Security Research	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mini.dev ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	mini.dev - research and OSS from Minimus	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 12
3ziz.me ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Abdulaziz Almadhi · Offensive Security Researcher \| 3ziz.me	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
adpt.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Adaptable Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bohops.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	bohops – A blog about cybersecurity research, education, and news	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasstej.tech ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Jasstej Singh - Cybersecurity Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
threatmine.io ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	threatmine.io – Cyber Threat Intel \| Security Research \| Data Science	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptoresearch.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Zero-knowledge Proofs \| Cryptographic Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
download-center.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	DownloadCenter \| The IT Professional's Research Library	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xrama.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Sriram Kidambi	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
threestack.io ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ThreeStack \| Build. Ship. Iterate.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaimelightfoot.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Constellations	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 4
mcginty.io ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	s3ansh33p (Sean McGinty) · GitHub	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xacb.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	0xacb	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bolazoo.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Zolaboo \|	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamiepegg.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Jamie Pegg	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.