similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jaredm.me

Jaredm alternatives & similar sites

Jared Macias | Engineer & Developer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
abubakr.bio ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Abu Bakr \| Python Developer & Cybersecurity Enthusiast	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lexiz.xyz ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	About \| 4zv4l@home	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reductor.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	reductor’s blog \| This blog is (will be) primarily focused on programming and security related stuff.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
solidityx.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	SolidityX - Secure-by-default superset of Solidity	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xa.day ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	0.D.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
wdblair.io ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	William Blair	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melanate.tech ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Nathan Hilliard	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emdwyer.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	emdwyer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mokshasoft.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Mokshasoft AB	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
adapt-and-attack.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Adapt and Attack	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kdmapper.dev ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Heinrich	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
werichardson.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Eli Richardson	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mjw.dev ↗	41 match 1 shared topics	Marvin Wendt \| Software Engineer & Open Source Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frqmod.dev ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	frqmod	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevincharm.com ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	kevincharm's webpage	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adonpaultomy.wiki ↗	40 match 1 shared topics	Adon Paul Tomy \| Flutter Developer & Security-Focused Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
renanmf.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Renan Moura - Software Engineering	en	programming-languages WordPress Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datamanagementengineer.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Spirit \| Engineer \| Sports	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.