similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jardas.de

Jardas alternatives & similar sites

Philipp Jardas — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jarsch.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Michael Jarsch	Germany de	technology-and-computing Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jam-edv.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Michael Jarsch	Germany de	technology-and-computing Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorisvante.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Dorisvante - Digitale Unterstützung, objektiv und verständlich	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nerdlangen.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Nerdlangen – Für digitale Mündigkeit. In Erlangen und Umgebung.	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
nerlangen.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Nerdlangen – Für digitale Mündigkeit. In Erlangen und Umgebung.	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
allin-marketing.de ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Mehrwert durch Daten! – Gerne helfe ich  smarten Unternehmungen auf ihrem spannenden Weg in die Digitalisierung!	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cre.fm ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CRE: Technik, Kultur, Gesellschaft \| Der Interview-Podcast mit Tim Pritlove	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-howl.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Howl - Ihre digitale Perspektive auf Innovation und Technologie in Bremerhaven	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cschlicht.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Cameron Schlicht	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cschwarz.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Christian Schwarz \| cschwarz.com	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horst-scheuer.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Horst Scheuer – Technik, Internet & mehr	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horst-scheuer.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Horst Scheuer – Technik, Internet & mehr	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hufschlaeger.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Hufschläger	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hytelium.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Anmelden · GitLab	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mykaefer.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	www.MyKaefer.net – Technik, Energie & Fahrzeuge	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myofb.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	myofb.de	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myofb.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	myofb.de	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nelson-ishag.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CHRONEXT \| Escalation Cockpit [Caliber v45: Crystal Logic]	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.