similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jannic.dev

Jannic alternatives & similar sites

Jannic Flückiger — Junior System Engineer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jaemdessources.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jaem Dessources \| Systems Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaemdessources.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jaem Dessources \| Systems Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
divymohanrai.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Divy Mohan Rai — Backend Engineer	India~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marjilabs.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Marji Labs - Platform Engineering & SRE Consulting	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adarsh.app ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Adarsh Mishra — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jadseifeddine.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jad Seifeddine · Senior Systems Development Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
siva.mk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	SIvA — Senior Embedded Systems Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xlunarhash.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	0xlunarhash \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
djurovski.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Marko Djurovski — System Engineer Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.digital ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.info ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.partners ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.services ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.technology ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrealization.consulting ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Growth systems, engineered to outperform	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.