similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to janetschwind.com

Janetschwind alternatives & similar sites

janet schwind – I write. I edit. I'm ridiculously professional. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jaywhistler.com ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	Jay Whistler – writer \| educator \| editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marseanelson.com ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	Marsea Nelson \| writer, editor, marketer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bookechoes.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Book Echoes – Write your way to success	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tiffteof.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	tiffany teofilo – writer, marketer, storyteller	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thoroughedits.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Thorough Edits \| thoroughly editing your written words	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owlfocusediting.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Owl Focus Editing	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paceediting.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	pace_editing	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
thewritersreverie.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	The Writer's Reverie - Notes on the craft of making stories.	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
bookreviewwriting.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Book Review Writing Service: Professional Help for Students	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesghancock.com ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	James G. Hancock – Write. Coffee. Repeat	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackdowdswritingblog.com ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Jack Dowd – Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackdowdwriter.com ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Jack Dowd – Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denacroog.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Dena Croog \| • • • Writer • • • Editor • • •	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marisacharpentier.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Marisa Charpentier – Writer, editor, fact-checker	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maryejoyce.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Mary E Joyce – Write Out of Chester	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdkwordsmith.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	MDK Wordsmith – editor of creative & practical writing	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bookanvil.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Book Anvil – write • edit • publish	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janetmock.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Janet Mock \| Writer, Director & Advocate	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.