similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jamesmelzer.com

Jamesmelzer alternatives & similar sites

James Melzer, User Experience Designer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jasondazey.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Jason Dazey \| User Experience Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcpux.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	jcpUX \| John Cornelis Park \| User Experience Design	en	web-design-and-html CS-Cart	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desireechek.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Desiree Chek – user experience design portfolio	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theuxdirector.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Timothy Whalin: User Experience Designer \| VUI Designer \| UX	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gallardolabs.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Gallardo Labs \| User Experience and Design Agency	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesmindesign.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	James Min – Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesporterux.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	James Porter UX – User Experience, User Interface & Graphic Design	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackbingham.me ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Jack Bingham - User Interface Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesrobertedward.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	James Boynton Graphic Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomascorneteau.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Corneteau - Lead Experience & UI Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designlady.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Design Lady \| CPACC Certified Experience Design & Adobe Expert	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamestaylorson.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	James Taylorson \|\| UX Researcher & Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denishsabhadiya.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Denish Sabhadiya – UI/UX Designer \| Product & Digital Experience Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markofalexander.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Mark Alexander – User Experience Professional	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesbuscher.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	James Buscher — UX/Product Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gcanino.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	GCDesigns \| Freelance Designer	en	web-design-and-html Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
james-lo.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	James Lo - Product Designer \| UX/UI	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamessparkes.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	James Sparkes - Product Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.