similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jalppi.com

Jalppi alternatives & similar sites

MARINE CONSERVATION ECOLOGY — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
spindriftscience.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Spindrift – marine science, stewardship, and sustainability	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ines-solutions.eu ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Home \| INES	European Union en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baharehhassanpour.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Bahareh Hassanpour – Welcome	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lwerden.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Leland K. Werden	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sarahnaughtin.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	SN	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saundersecologylab.com ↗	48 match 2 shared topics	Saunders Ecology Lab – Biodiversity, Community Ecology, Conservation	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
thinkinglikeahuman.com ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Thinking like a human \| Conservation for the 21st century	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lanierlab.org ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Lanier Lab – mammal evolution \| biodiversity \| conservation	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sasaki-lab.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Zooplankton Ecology and Adaptation Lab at UMass Lowell -	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
felicialasmana.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Felicia Lasmana – Conservation Biologist & Sustainability Practitioners	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewilsonlab.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Alexander Wilson \| Behavioural & Marine Ecology Laboratory	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csl-unbc.org ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Conservation Solutions Lab \| University of Northern British Columbia	en	environment Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thilinadesilva.com ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	The De Silva Lab of Ecology & Evolution	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lamannalab.org ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Joseph A. LaManna – Community, Population & Quantitative Ecology	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marineboard.eu ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Home \| European Marine Board	European Union en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anaee.eu ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	AnaEE-ERIC – Analysis and Experimentation on Ecosystems	European Union en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
biologyreference.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Biology	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meeg.org ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Marine Evolutionary Ecology Group – Professor Dustin Marshall’s research lab, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.