similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jakobjansen.de

Jakobjansen alternatives & similar sites

Jakob Jansen – human-centered experience — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aboelezz.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Osama Aboelezz – Human-centered design specialist	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studionoun.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Studio Noun - STUDIO NOUN: HUMAN-CENTERED ARCHITECTURE.	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studiobluemonday.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Studio Blue Monday – Branded Illustration & Digital Experience Design – Studio Blue Monday	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nest-one.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Nest One GmbH \| Brand. Experience. Architecture	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3stn.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	3STN. boutique studio for brand experience and communication	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreasburbach.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Andreas Burbach - Creative Concept & User Experience	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janinabraun.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ONOGRIT Studio • Life-Centered Design for a new society	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jansenkontor.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jansen & Jansen – Jansen Kreativ Kontor	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreascloss.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Customer Experience Management & UX Entwicklung – Andreas Cloß	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
j-reinhard.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jakob Reinhard – Home	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jan-mensen.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jan Mensen – Gestaltung -	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3deluxe.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	– 3deluxe - Transdisciplinary Design –	Germany de	design Storyblok	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joergsebald.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jörg Sebald · Interdisciplinary Designer	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juliatauchert.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Julia Tauchert – Brand Identity & Creative Strategy	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
johannes-schwaderer.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Johannes Schwaderer – Freelance Senior UX-Designer based in Berlin	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kopfsprung07.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Johannes Schwaderer – Freelance Senior UX-Designer based in Berlin	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adrian-wilhelm.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	STUDIO.WILHELM — ART DIRECTION & DESIGN	Germany de	design Prismic	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studioneo.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	STUDIO NEO – Creating Brand Identities.	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.