similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jakerains.com

Jakerains alternatives & similar sites

Jake Rains - Projects, Field Notes, and Learning Systems — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
markmun.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Mark Mun – Notes, projects, and experiments	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dheerajvagavolu.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Field Notes on AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
firesmith.ca ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Firesmith Systems – Hidden strain, drift, and early warning	Canada en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rrod.co ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Field Notes \| Roger Rodriguez	Colombia en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jayyu.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jay Yu – Personal Blog & Projects	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaydlawrence.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jayd's Projects	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dhisham.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	KYFEX - AI Systems That Ship, Scale, and Last	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaredplumb.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jared Plumb \| AI Engineering, Software Engineering, and Learning Product Leadership	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mattlouden.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Technical Leader, HubSpot Architect, and AI Systems Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
tienhoangtran.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Tien Tran \| Portfolio, Data Science, Projects, Experience	United States~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dragsbaek.tech ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Dragsbaek’s Lab: Learning, experiments and technical writing.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aigenschema.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	AI tool research, SaaS guides, and workflow systems	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mateoneira.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Mateo Neira \| Machine Learning, Applied Mathematics, and Network Science	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dezyre.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ProjectPro - Solved Big Data and Data Science Projects	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradluo.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Brad Luo — Tools, Projects & Experiments	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
singhanuvrat.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Anuvrat — Thinking in systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deploymlops.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Build and Deploy MLOps - Production ML Engineering	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drewlittrell.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Drew Littrell — Product Architecture and Systems Design	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.