similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jakelawrence.ca

Jakelawrence alternatives & similar sites

Jake Lawrence – Computer Scientist — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
bottomupcs.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Computer Science from the Bottom Up	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
comptalk.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Computer Talk	en	computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computerguruji.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Home - Computer Guru Ji	en	computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computernxtechnology.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home - Computer Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computer-adventures.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Computer Adventures	en	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computerotika.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home - computerotika	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shrutipmahajan.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Shruti Mahajan Computer Science Assistant Professor Human Computer Interaction Researcher	en	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devhq.info ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	DEVHQ SYSTEMS LIMITED \| Computer Systems Design	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
computercarriage.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ComputerCarriage – Lets flourish ITeas	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conferencehunter.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS 2025 (i-SCOMATICS 2025)	en	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cincoze.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Cincoze – Rugged Edge Computing	en	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algorithmstoliveby.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Algorithms to Live By - The Computer Science of Human Decisions by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computersandtech.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ComputersAndTech	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100freesoft.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Computer Geek Blog – history of computer software and hardware	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computertechplace.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Computertechplace	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
compsystech.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CompSysTech - International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computechprods.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Computech	United States~ en	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computersheep.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Computer Sheep - Home to many computerized sheep.	en	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.