similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to j-dot.org

J Dot alternatives & similar sites

J. Simmons, Ph.D. – Digital Engineer | OSHW Advocate | All Around Geek — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sandeepkaul.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sandeep Kaul \| Software Engineer \| Youtuber	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
1x.engineer ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1x Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
topscreenmedia.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	TopscreenMedia – Digital Signage	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imsotight.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Im So Tight – Digital Innovation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkcyber.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Thinkcyber NYC – Digital	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
felipezorzo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Felipe \| Senior Software Engineer \| Felipe Zorzo	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abovetheattic.africa ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Above the Attic \| Africa's Digital Playground	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambdaground.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lambda Ground - Engineering & Insight	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanderverdiesen.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Sander Verdiesen – Engineering with an impact	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
addictedto.engineering ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Addicted to engineering – The developer culture of too much coffee	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baised.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BAiSED — Principal Engineer // baisedagent.base.eth	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaroncrowder.codes ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Crowder \| Chief Engineer & Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbse.app ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Welcome \| Systems Engineering Toolkit	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainhub.eu ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Brainhub – software engineering company	European Union en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
adams.place ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adam Boudjemaa \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baileykh.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bailey Henderson — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
indialib.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	IndiaLib – Your Digital Library	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandipan.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Sandipan Dey – Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.