similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to it42.de

It42 alternatives & similar sites

s1.hoffart.de – tiffy5 — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Computer Networking →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ueberlegt.com ↗	55 match 1 shared topics	s1.hoffart.de – tiffy5	de	computer-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
brostovski.com ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	www.mfuse.de - Startseite RE 4	de	computer-networking	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
das-radio.de ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	NOTFUNKNETZWERK.DE – Wenn alles ausfällt, kommunizieren wir weiter.	Germany de	computer-networking WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dasradio.de ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	NOTFUNKNETZWERK.DE – Wenn alles ausfällt, kommunizieren wir weiter.	Germany de	computer-networking WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
two-morrow.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	two-morrow - denkt an morgen – Two Morrow	Austria de	computing TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
trinler.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	trinler.net – the source of information	Austria de	computer-networking WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
segron.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	SEGRON – The Next Generation of Active Testing	Austria de	computer-networking WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
downloadserver.org ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	UC@Work – Externes Hirn	de	computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
valo.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	valo.at – Nothing here…	Austria de	computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brandnet.io ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	brandnet.io – brandnet.io	de	computer-networking WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
turngeek.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	TurnGeek – So wird's gemacht	de	computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sns.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Saturn Networking Solutions – SNS	Austria de	computer-networking WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
daedanet.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Daedanet GmbH – we build networks.	Germany de	computer-networking WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spirik.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Spirik Netzwerktechnik – Internet für alle	Austria de	computer-networking WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tandu.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	IT verstehen – einfach erklärt \| TanduWiki	Austria de	computer-networking	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dakoserv.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	dakoServ – Daten Kommunikation Service Gmbh	Germany de	computer-networking WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anc-systemhaus.online ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	ANC-Systemhaus – advance network communication	de	computer-networking WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
otdr.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Optische Messtechnik – Marktführende Lösungen	Austria de	computer-networking HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.