similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to it-jensen.de

It Jensen alternatives & similar sites

it-jensen – Jan Ole Jensen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jannikdreier.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jannik DREIER – Jannik DREIER	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awog.cloud ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Anmelden – AWOG GmbH	de	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angela-lorenz.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Login – Trusterix	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1tyme.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	1m.al – Just once.	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
auditkonform.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Rezension – Eigene Wertung	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cluetech.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home – CLUE	Switzerland de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jsksoft.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	AccountTrace – Find & Clean Old Online Accounts	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberfit.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Vorbereitet auf Cybergefahren – was immer kommt	Switzerland de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mach-consulting.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	machCon – compliance simplified.	Switzerland de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
machcon.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	machCon – compliance simplified.	Switzerland de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
janalhorn.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Jan Alhorn – Hobby Project, IT Passion, Social Links	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 3
0xr.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	0xR – Cyber Sec	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenswatch.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jens Watch – Personal Knowledge Base	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakkaru.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jakkaru – Proactive Cybersecurity Defense	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jensblust.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jens Blust – IT, Unternehmen und Gesellschaft	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybershield.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CyberShield – kinesys	Switzerland de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cyber-forensics.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Start – HanseSecure GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kai-wittenburg.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	My CMS – Kai Wittenburg	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.