similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ip-design.net

Ip Design alternatives & similar sites

COAST DESIGN – Ihr Senior Visual Communication Partner — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
abracradama.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	abracradama - visual communication	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-umi.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	u&mi – visual communication	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annaweirich.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Anna Weirich - Visual Communication Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kawawa.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	kawawa - visual communication	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathan-auch.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Studio Jonathan Auch — Visual Communication — Graphic Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foreground.ch ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	foreground communication GmbH	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
neueformation.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Neue Formation – Designbüro für visuelle Kommunikation	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johannohessdesign.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	JOHANNO HESS DESIGN \| GRAPHIC DESIGN – SPATIAL COMMUNICATION	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johannohess.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	JOHANNO HESS DESIGN \| GRAPHIC DESIGN – SPATIAL COMMUNICATION	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annasportfolio.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Anna Laumer - communication & motion design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreakowalski.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Andrea Kowalski – Visual Communication, Corporate Design, Brand Environments	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitarbeitermagazine.ch ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	magazindesign – wir machen ihr magazin design	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
khunger.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	visuelle kommunikation \| design klaus hunger	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alanseng.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Alan Seng – Communication designer based in Germany	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakub.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jakub Stejskal – Visuelle Kommunikation: Präsentationen, Infografiken & Motion Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jonaskeseberg.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jonas Keseberg // Visuelle Kommunikation & Grafik Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kiecok.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	DBMK Designbureau – Büro für visuelle Kommunikation	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
geiervisuell.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Geiervisuell \| Visuelle Kommunikation \| Grafik Design \| Freiburg	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.