similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to integrityaction.org

Integrityaction alternatives & similar sites

Integrity Action - citizen monitoring using tech for development — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civic Affairs →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
5minutecitizen.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Inspiring Citizens with Stories of Action and Collaboration	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hpkcoalition.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Coalition for Equitable Community Development - Home	en	civic-affairs Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oceanoedc.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Oceano Economic Development Council	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctchouston.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Citizens' Transportation Coalition - Home	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
huntlydt.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Huntly Development Trust - Creating Opportunities for Huntly & District	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ctariders.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Citizens Taking Action	United States~ en	civic-affairs Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1stopgov.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Riverton Borough - Citizen Action Center	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cwcdafrica.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	cwcd – Centre For Civic, Citizen’s Welfare And Community Development	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csdaction.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Centre For Social Development - Kanyakumari,Tamilnadu,INDIA	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hrpm.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HRPM.org \| Human Rights Protection & Monitoring	en	civic-affairs	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rdeco.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - RURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EMPOWERING COMMUNITY	en	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cvi-actionplan.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Community Violence Intervention Action Plan - CVI Action Plan	en	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
efcgt.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Elizabeth Forward Citizens for Government Transparency	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccac.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Chicago Central Area Committee \| Planning to Spark Chicago's Development	en	civic-affairs Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
assemblyexplainer.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Citizens' Assembly Explainer	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nwc-cac.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	National Western Center Citizens Advisory Committee	United States~ en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4urban.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4urban – Institute for Urban Development	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
menawatch.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Civic Space Watchdog \| Monitoring Civic Space in the MENA Region	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.