similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to incompetencebook.com

Incompetencebook alternatives & similar sites

Incompetence in the Workplace — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
theworkplacestop.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home - The WorkplaceStop	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3ddoneright.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	5 Steps in Managing Underperformance in the Workplace	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
teamworkproject.eu ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	TEAMWORK - COMBAT SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE	European Union en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkplaceatelier.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Workplace Atelier - The Workplace Atelier	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworktheory.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Work Theory	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
toptopworkplaces.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Top Workplaces \| The Best Companies to Work For	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
topworkplaces.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Top Workplaces \| The Best Companies to Work For	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
topworkplacesapp.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Top Workplaces \| The Best Companies to Work For	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkwing.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Work Wing	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewolfworks.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Wolf Works	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onobe.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Onobe \| Be In The Game	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imranworkplacementor.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Imran Datoo \| Workplace Mentor	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkplaceobserver.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Workplace Observer - Field notes from the modern workplace.	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworstworkers.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Worst Workers	en	human-resources Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkforcechannel.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| The Workforce Channel	en	human-resources Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkingenneagram.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Working Enneagram	United States~ en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkplacebrief.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Workplace Brief - Know your rights. Build your record. Show up prepared.	en	human-resources WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkplacechoice.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Employee Benefit Plans \| Workplace Choice	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.