similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to inchcolm.com

Inchcolm alternatives & similar sites

David Llamas | Curriculum Vitae — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
torvexis.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Torvexis \| AI & Cyber Consulting	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
torvexis.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Torvexis \| AI & Cyber Consulting	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cloudsecurityalliance.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home \| CSA	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csaurl.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home \| CSA	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csaqr.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home \| CSA	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csaexample.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home \| CSA	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cornercore.ai ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CornerCore AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cooties.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Cooties@Blog \| Cybersecurity & AI Research Insights	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fernandotucci.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Fernando Tucci	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlinecloudsec.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Moshe Ferber \| Cloud Security Evangelist & AI Safety Expert	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptovoip.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CryptoVoip Technologies \| AI, Security & Innovation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptovoips.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CryptoVoip Technologies \| AI, Security & Innovation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
improverisk.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Proactive Business Security with Improve Risk Solutions \| Improve Risk	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aisi.gov.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	The AI Security Institute (AISI)	United Kingdom en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onionio.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	onionio.com - accelerated resilience, trusted ai	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2thrivellc.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Cyber Security and AI Consulting	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackswantechnologies.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	AI, Cybersecurity & Risk Management Consulting \| Black Swan Technologies%	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
thomasdevos.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Talks AI: AI Agent Security, Claude Code & Production Engineering	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.