similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ims-jb.com

Ims Jb alternatives & similar sites

IMS Journalistenbüro — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
queering.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Malte Göbel, Journalist	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thumi.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Thumilan Selvakumaran - Journalist Text und Bild	de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alicebritschgi.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alice Britschgi – Journalistin	Switzerland de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pressebuero-hein.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Text und Bild vom Journalisten - Pressebüro Hein - Text und Bild	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
presse-fisa.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Friedhelm Müller-Düring – Journalist	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
easyword-do.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	easyWord-do – Ulf Möhrke – freier Journalist	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreahurschler.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journalismus & Kommunikation \| Andrea Hurschler - Andrea Hurschler	Switzerland de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
pr-echt.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Fachjournalistin Hedda Precht, PR-echt Pressearbeit und Text	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
in-worten.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Christina Fries – Freie Journalistin und Texterin im Saarland	de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pr-redakteurin.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Petra Uhe - Corporate Publishing - Journalistin und PR-Redakteurin	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
e-wendt.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Med. Schreibbüro & Lektorat	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stahlhacke.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Kommunikationsbüro Stahlhacke - Startseite	de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
pressebuero-es.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Pressebüro-Esslingen	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
post-authoring.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pressebuero-cbo.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	pressebuero-cbo.de Home	Germany de	freelance-writing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stadtland-kind.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Texte & Co. Redaktionsbüro Greiner	de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eddahattebier.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Edda Hattebier \| Lektoratsbüro \|	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
presse-mallmann.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Guenter Mallmann	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.