similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to impactorientedgroup.com

Impactorientedgroup alternatives & similar sites

Impact Oriented Group — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
impactweaver.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Impact Weaver	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
impactso.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Impactso	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewestcloudgroup.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Westcloud Group	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturaldiplomats.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cultural Diplomat Impact Organization	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
impactonpeople.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home \| John Cox: Impact On People	en	non-profit-organizations Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
impulsamosimpacto.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Impulsamos Impacto	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelyaari.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Yaari Group	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sppelitaair.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Serikat Kerja Group	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextgenfruitgroup.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NextGen Fruit Group	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewercgroup.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The WERC Group, LLC.	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluemeridian.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Blue Meridian Partners: Results-Oriented Philanthropists	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluemeridianpartner.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Blue Meridian Partners: Results-Oriented Philanthropists	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluemeridianpartners.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Blue Meridian Partners: Results-Oriented Philanthropists	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluemeridianphilanthropy.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Blue Meridian Partners: Results-Oriented Philanthropists	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackleadershipgroup.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Black Leadership Group	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onourshoulders.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	On Our Shoulders Group	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbrimpactfoundation.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Malla Bhaskar Rao Impact Foundation	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbg.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Marlborough Brandt Group	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.