similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to igpp.org.uk

Igpp alternatives & similar sites

The Institute of Government and Public Policy | IGPP — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Political Issues And Policy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
policylabmv.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Public Policy Lab — Maldives	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
palestinepolicy.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	PCPP - Palestine Center for Public Policy	United States~ en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policyaz.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	POLICY AZ \| Legislative Lobbying \| Government Relations \| Public Affairs Strategy \| Media Relations	United States~ en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alaskapoliticsexplained.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Alaska Politics Explained - Alaskans Factual Information on Government Actions	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afripoli.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Home \| APRI – Africa Policy Research Institute	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pakistan.gov.pk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Government of Pakistan	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pakistanpolicyinstitute.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Pakistan Policy Institute – pakistan policy institute	en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laspag.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Lion and Sun Public Affairs Guild	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbowring.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	the real movement which abolishes the present state of things \| Bill Bowring's news and publications	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbpnetwork.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home - Black and Brown Policy Network	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
morgovium.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Morgovium \| The magical element of “more government”	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policycn.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	China Policy \| home page	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mecep-action.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	MECEP Action - The official political and advocacy arm of the Maine Center for Economic Policy	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1yrofwins.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	UNC Government Achievements - Newspaper Wrap	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p2publicaffairs.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home \| P2 Public Affairs	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
politicoverse.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home - Politicoverse	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
oxfordchinapolicylab.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Oxford China Policy Lab	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdppc.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	We Won't Be Silent Anymore: Maryland PPC on the Issues & More	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.