similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to iconuganda.org

Iconuganda alternatives & similar sites

ICON Uganda – Innovation for Conservation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ceiba.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Ceiba Foundation for Tropical Conservation	United States~ en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3cuganda.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	3C Uganda – Climate & Conservation Community \| Building a Resilient Future	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conservation.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Conservation International	en	environment Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbzraptorfund.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	MBZ Raptor Conservation Fund	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ohioconservationfederation.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Ohio Conservation Federation	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nywolf.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Wolf Conservation Center	en	environment WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctnc.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Courageous Conservation - Conservation Trust for North Carolina	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cuecf.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CUECF — Community United Environmental Conservation Foundation	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cvscef.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - Conservation Voters of South Carolina Education Fund	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbbminternational.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CBBM International – Community-led Conservation in Cameroon	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
btcv.org.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	TCV \| The Conservation Volunteers	United Kingdom en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ceeecf.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CEEECF - Climate Earth Environmental Conservation Foundation	en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curacaonature.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Curacao Nature Conservation - Curacao Nature Conservation	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cecicug.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CECIC Uganda \| Climate Justice & Conservation in Rwenzori	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
megaconservationeducationraffle.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mega Conservation Education Raffle	en	environment Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
megaeducationconservationraffle.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mega Conservation Education Raffle	en	environment Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oarreefs.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Organization for Artificial Reefs \| Big Bend Marine Conservation	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philipsonfoundation.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Art & Conservation United \| Philipson Foundation - Philipson Foundation	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.