similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to iclap.org

Iclap alternatives & similar sites

ICLAP | International Conference of Linguistic Association of Pakistan — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Language Learning →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
acalafrica.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ACAL \| The Association of Contemporary African Linguistics	en	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internationalcontacts.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	International Contacts	United Kingdom en	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eflgroup.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	EFL International Education Group	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internationalcamp.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	International Camp	Brazil en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
educationalroleoflanguage.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	International Association & Group for the EDUCATIONAL ROLE OF LANGUAGE – (ERL Association / ERL Group)	en	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acle.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	A.c.l.e. – Associazione Culturale Linguistica Educational	en	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
educationalcentre.al ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Educational Center \| Educational Resources, Exams & Conferences	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scae-international.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	SCAE International - HOME	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sef-international.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Science and Education for the Future - SEF International	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nacos.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	NACOS International Institute	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aati-online.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	American Association of Teachers of Italian \|	en	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aataweb.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	American Association of Teachers of Arabic - Home	en	language-learning phpBB	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aatg.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	American Association of Teachers of German \| AATG	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aatk.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AATK \| American Association of Teachers of Korean	en	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aatj.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - American Association of Teachers of Japanese	en	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcland.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MCLAND International Language Center	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
milolanguagecenter.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Milo International Language Center \|	en	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
waypointstarusa.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Waypoint Star International	en	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.