similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to icdevs.org

Icdevs alternatives & similar sites

Open-source public goods for the Internet Computer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
gurubest.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Gurubest.com the internet and computer GURU	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meaningfulcode.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Open-source for good	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5e-net.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Why the Internet Is No Longer Enough	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guillermo-roman.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Guillermo Roman \| Rethinking the internet identity crisis	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4founders.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	4Founders: Honest feedback for open-source projects and the people who ship them	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
athenaindex.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Athena Index \| Credibility Infrastructure for the Internet	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
richardskingdom.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Richard's Kingdom \| Writing wrongs on the internet since 2006	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
richard-stanton.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Richard Stanton \| My small corner of the internet	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseydavis.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Casey Davis: The number one Casey Davis on the internet.	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlasrepo.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ATLASREPO \| Live Open-Source Catalog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
randomairborne.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	valk's corner \| valk's little corner of the internet	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csse-journal.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	International Journal of Computer Systems Science and Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qplanck.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	QPlanck - Quantum Intelligence for the Future	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
qosf.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Quantum Open Source Foundation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quantuminternetalliance.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Quantum Internet Alliance	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iccm.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ICCM International \| The Intersection of Tech and Missions	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ngi.eu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Next Generation Internet	European Union en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atrolab.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AtroLab \| Computer Vision Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.