similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to horsfallnathan.com

Horsfallnathan alternatives & similar sites

Nathan Horsfall | Software Engineer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nencraft.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Raffi Gevorgyan — Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dowbecki.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Karol Dowbecki – On software engineering	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donsbot.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Control.Monad.Writer – Software engineering, compilers, languages	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
psfmember.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Python Software Foundation	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atymo.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	About Software Development and real life ..	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xeb.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Shortjump! \| Reversing engineering, programming and what not…	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cazalas.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Cazalas, PhD	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetnakama.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	.NET Nakama \| Helps software developers to improve their skills by providing easy reading articles in simple words.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lkcacademy.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Let Kids Code (LKC) – empowering the next generation of software crafters.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skorks.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Skorks	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interpreterbook.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Writing An Interpreter In Go \| Thorsten Ball	en	programming-languages Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
code-projects.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Download Free Open Source Projects \| PHP, C++ \| Source code & Projects	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
damonhall.co.uk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Damon Hall \| IT Manager \| Programmer	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnet-tv.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	.NET Videos Tutorials – .NET Software Development Tutorials and Videos: C#, ASP, SQL Server, Linq, Visual Basic, Silverlight, Azure	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hourofpython.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Trinket: An Hour of Python	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catencode.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CATENCODE \| speak in c0d3 & chase c1ph3r5	en	programming-languages Drupal	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bitecode.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Bite code! \| Substack	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ptanq.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ptanq	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.