similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to haskellcosm.com

Haskellcosm alternatives & similar sites

HaskellCosm :: Haskell in Production — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
move-patterns.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Introduction - Move Patterns: Design Patterns for Resource Based Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bootcamptoprod.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	BootcampToProd - Start From Basics, Move To Production	en	programming-languages WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mozart2.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mozart Programming System	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aerolang.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Introduction - Aero Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamlang.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jam Programming Language - Jam	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
threadsafebooks.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mumps Programming Language	United States~ en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javapro.io ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	JAVAPRO \| Magazine for professional Java development in practical use	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javaboutique.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Java Programming Tutorials and Developer Resources	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mineshspc.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| CS@Mines High School Programming Competition	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mostlyerlang.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mostly Erlang \| Erlang and sometimes other functional programming	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skev.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Skev — Fast like C++. Easy to read like Python.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skev.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Skev — Fast like C++. Easy to read like Python.	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javaicebreakers.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Java Ice Breakers – Collection of Java programs to strengthen the Core & Advanced Java concepts in a practical way.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csalgorithm.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Implementation of algorithms in C#	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theta-lang.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Theta Language \| The Programming Language for Real-Time Data Analysis	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theswiftdev.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Articles about application development - The.Swift.Dev.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skylinehenderson.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	PLDB: a Programming Language DataBase	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jan-rehders.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	sheijk.net	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.