similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ha-buff.com

Ha Buff alternatives & similar sites

Celtern . Celtern: Empowering Blockchain Solutions — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
3vium.com ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	Home Page - Trivium Solutions	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digisofttrsol.com ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	Home \| Digisoft Transformation Solutions	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cudasolutions.net ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Home - Cuda Solutions	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsolutions.net ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	About Ox Solutions \| Your Partner in Custom Software & Digital Innovation	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
0xsolutions.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	About Ox Solutions \| Your Partner in Custom Software & Digital Innovation	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
thetechrangers.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Tech Rangers Consulting Services Inc — Innovative Software Solutions	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
4idps.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Custom Software Development Company \| 4i Tech	Taiwan~ en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
4itech.io ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Custom Software Development Company \| 4i Tech	Taiwan~ en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
decode.agency ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	Full-service software development \| DECODE	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saulti.com ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	Saulti TechWorks — Technology for Human Empowerment	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkcrazy.co ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Sinan Bolel \| Director, Software Engineering \| Aquia Inc.	Colombia en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bolel.dev ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Sinan Bolel \| Director, Software Engineering \| Aquia Inc.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bolel.io ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Sinan Bolel \| Director, Software Engineering \| Aquia Inc.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trumed.co ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	TruMed	Colombia en	software-and-applications Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackschuss.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Jack Schuss	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jasonsutiono.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Jason Alexander Sutiono	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oveotech.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Home \| OveoTech	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
deonhargrove.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Experienced Software Engineer \| End-to-End Project Delivery \| Deon Hargrove	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.