similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to guycombinator.com

Guycombinator alternatives & similar sites

Little thoughts — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
blev.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Little Epiphanies	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mcmanus.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Matt McManus \| The thoughts and deeds of Matt McManus	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blueberrywren.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Blueberry Wren Thoughts	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qword.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	QWORD \| Thoughts about how the world works, from a technologist.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4ts.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Thoughts, Tech, Tips & Tricks ... 4Ts	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theitguyrox.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Blake's Blog - Blake's thoughtsBlake's Blog \| Blake's thoughts	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robsonjr.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Robson Braga \| Sharing my learnings and thoughts.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffcrews.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Random Thoughts of Jeff Crews	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boseonthe.rocks ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Bose On The Rocks! - Some hacks. Some thoughts. Some projects.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rjeon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ryan's Little Home	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doubleoughts.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Double Oughts	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquitty.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	McQuitty – Thoughts on being a system engineer (SE) and software	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffyang.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Read Only Memory \| jeffyang.io	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcengelking.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	jcengelking.dev – Ideas and observations on Microsoft solutions and tech.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
turbomarc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	TURBOMARC - Notes from the field	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guyhod.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	guyhod	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rjsjournal.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	RJS Journal – My thoughts, ideas, events	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tupps.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Tupps.com – Random Thoughts of Luke Tupper	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.