similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to gus.engineer

Gus alternatives & similar sites

Gus Narea — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
miwong.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Michelle Wong • Software engineer in computer security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maik.sh ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Maik de Kruif	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xed.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	0xEdward	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
0xedward.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	0xEdward	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
0xedward.io ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	0xEdward	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
0xedward.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	0xEdward	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
0dayallday.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	0DAYALLDAY	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdixon.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Michael Dixon	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdxn.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Michael Dixon	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ssh-rsa.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Michaela 'Ema' Dawson	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexdumitru.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AlexDumitru.me – Notes about entrepreneurship, life and technology.	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dennis-mo.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dennis Mo	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
majidmc2.site ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Majid-Iranpour \| Security Engineer, Software Security Developer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
kevinpdyer.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Kevin P. Dyer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nevermiss.tech ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Nevermiss \| Data Science & Cybersecurity	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexandertrifa.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alex Trifa	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevin-muirhead.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Muirhead — Software Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
majdaltoufic.xyz ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Toufic Majdalani \| Security Software Engineer & Linux Developer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.