similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to godfreyhendrix.com

Godfreyhendrix alternatives & similar sites

Godfrey Hendrix — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
stephengodfrey.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Godfrey	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaron-hendricks.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Hendricks	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whenderson.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	William Henderson	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ghoofman.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Hoofman	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
endres.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Bryan Endres	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
renzobeux.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Renzo Beux — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keshaldesai.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Keshal Desai · Engineering leader building real-time distributed systems.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexbvolcy.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alex B. Volcy \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stevedonaghy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Steve Donaghy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquitty.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	McQuitty – Thoughts on being a system engineer (SE) and software	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akshansh.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Akshansh Bhatt	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
thebuildlog.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Build Log!	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marlow.quest ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ash Marlow	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
abdelrahmanali.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Abdelrahman Ali — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 17
mason.bio ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mason \| Mastering the art of figuring it out	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naxxfish.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	naxxfish	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
benbosco.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Benedetto Bosco	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
kingsleycodes.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Building Scalable, Intelligent Systems \| KingsleyCodes ⚡	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.