similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to gitmdw.com

Gitmdw alternatives & similar sites

GitMDW — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mcgit.place ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	MCGIT Place	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aligntag.net ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Git of TripGuru Inc	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
aa8s.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Sign In - 我的学习测试	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
git-jtipolije.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Git	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gitawonk.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Git Paid Not Played	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
git-qsarlab.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	QSAR Lab Git	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gitea.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - go-gitea/gitea: Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD · GitHub	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
gitmux.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home \| gitmux	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gitryx.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	GitRyx	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
4lab.su ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	4lab - Хроники серверной химика	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keystack.app ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Firekeys.app	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elixircd.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	ElixIRCd Documentation \| ElixIRCd	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netellyfish.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	danet / goSDN · GitLab	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meatchunk.xyz ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Meat Chunk	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechanus.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Von Random - mechanus.net: because why the fuck not	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gitalpha.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Sign in - GitAlpha	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
glazomer.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Purple Gaze, Inc. Development Platform	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meltinbitfarm.cloud ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Meltin Bit Farm — Self-hosted software tools for developers	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.