similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to githubnext.com

Githubnext alternatives & similar sites

GitHub Next — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
universebingo.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	GitHub Universe Bingo!	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
synchronizeteams.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SynchronizeTeams · GitHub Org	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
1nikolas.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1nikolas (Nikolas Spiridakis) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arnaud-muller.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Nosudrum (Arnaud Muller) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arogy.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aroji.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cpynet.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CPYNET — NextGen Tech Hub	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cpnbook.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	cpnbook/README.md at master · lmkr/cpnbook · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icken.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Thijsiez (Thijs Koppen) · GitHub	Switzerland en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
propi.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	propilideno (Lucas de Almeida) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coveapp.info ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home · anacrolix/cove Wiki · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
covenants.watch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Covenant tools softfork by jamesob · Pull Request #28550 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sysaffairs.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home	en	technology-and-computing Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arnolio.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Arnolio - Arnold Truong's Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
medo64.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Medo's Home Page	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sysrtm.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SysRTM - Keep it Simple and Straight	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arkin.me ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	👋 Labnotes (by Assaf Arkin)	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
arphaxad.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Omale	en	technology-and-computing Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.