similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to giovanifsilva.com

Giovanifsilva alternatives & similar sites

Giovani F. Silva — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
giovanialtelino.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Giovani Altelino - Giovani Altelino	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ricardo-garcia-silva.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Ricardo Garcia Silva	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fsilva.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	fernando silva \| dev	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
gio-devops-projects.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Giovanni Alvarez — Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giovannicolognesi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Giovanni Colognesi - Nexus	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
e-handyworld.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ricardo Polycarpo Montagner da Silva - HOMEPAGE	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ricardopolycarpo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ricardo Polycarpo Montagner da Silva - HOMEPAGE	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giovannifazi.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Giovanni Fazi \| portfolio and other stuff	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
terezasaskova.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giolaq.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Giovanni Laquidara - Developer Advocate & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
abdelkarim.pro ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio \| Systems Architect & Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
willdasilva.xyz ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Will Da Silva - Incidentally Human	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giovannitarter.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Giovanni Tarter's resume, by Orbit	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nahombereket.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giteshkumar.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Gitesh Kumar	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ndimitrijevic.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Nikola Dimitrijevic \| Full Stack Developer Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giterror.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Welcome - GITERROR	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mylan.io ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mylan Connolly	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.