similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to ghoofman.com

Ghoofman alternatives & similar sites

Garrett Hoofman — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
garretthughes.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Hughes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garrett-berg.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Berg	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garrettgunther.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Gunther	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
garrettordner.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Ordner	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garrettpatterson.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Patterson	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberexplorer.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Explorer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
maxpetretta.xyz ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Max Petretta	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maxpetretta.blog ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Max Petretta	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
engineeringwithpalden.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	and in the centered nav brand below --> Palden	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1trustreview.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	1TrustReview — One honest take per product. No filler.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
garretthardin.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Hardin — Engineer, Builder, Cofounder of Masterfile	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marlow.quest ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ash Marlow	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
garrettgehle.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Garrett Gehle — Backend / Platform Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcl.im ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Marcus Lyons \| Digital Garden 🪴	en	technology-and-computing Gatsby	robotsllmsai humans	emailphone	none
aaronkoshy.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Koshy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamp.rocks ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Adam Pieniazek - Software engineering leader and father — writing about civic life, transit, tech, Boston and the Celtics, on a bicycle between things.	en	technology-and-computing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sreyasarathy.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sreya Sarathy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinpo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Po - Product Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.