similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to funzelcraft.de

Funzelcraft alternatives & similar sites

Funzelcraft – Design Ausleuchtung – UI/UX Design — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sascha-hanke.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Lena – UI/UX Design Portfolio	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kodesign-muc.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	KODESIGN-MUC – Grafik – Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thierryguidicelli.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Thierry Guidicelli – UI/UX Designer based in Lucerne	de	design Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d-m-d.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	DMD – Daniel Markus Design – Grafik Designer \| Freelancer	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sabineappel.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Sabine Appel – UX Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sarahvollmer.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	UI / UX Design Sarah Vollmer - UX & UI Design	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
riot72.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Buscher \| UX Design – —	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romano-design.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Romano Amend – Design, Grafikdesign, Webdesign, Fotografie	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romanodesign.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Romano Amend – Design, Grafikdesign, Webdesign, Fotografie	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landmagd.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	LANDMAGD - Design aus der Heide	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roger-graf.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Roger Graf – Senior UX Designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heartpiece-global.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Freelance UX Designer Berlin \| UX Design & Digital Product Design	de	design WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanderklein.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Sander Klein – Designer & Illustrator	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandmann-design.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Sandmann Design \| Bärbel Sandmann, Diplom Grafik Designerin aus Köln.	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
el-vogel.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	EL VOGEL DESIGN \| EL VOGEL DESIGN - Designagentur	Germany~ de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aorta.design ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Aorta Design Studio - Aorta – Brand Identity und Design Studio in Baden	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
konturenreich.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	KONTURENREICH \| Grafikdesign · Kommunikationsdesign aus Köln	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samikaddoura.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Sami Kaddoura – UX/UI Designer	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.