similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to fundtastic.ch

Fundtastic alternatives & similar sites

Wer ist Fundtastic — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mediaforwardfund.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Media Forward Fund	de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 3
nonprofit-journalism.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Media Forward Fund	Germany de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gruenalpha.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GRÜN alpha \| führende Fundraising Agentur: Neuspender, Großspender, Nachlass	de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
social-call.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	SOCIAL CALL – Fundraising	Austria de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
socialcall.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	SOCIAL CALL – Fundraising	Austria de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
rache-ist-suess.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Rache ist süß e.V. i.G. \| Verein in Gründung	de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nif-deutschland.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - NIF Deutschland - New Israel Fund	Germany de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neolo.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	neolo fundraising GmbH	Germany de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fundoffice.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	die fundraising agentur	Austria de	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
karin-chierchia.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Karin Chierchia I Fundraising I Spendenprojekte I Charity	de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardegg-fundraising.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	home » Hardegg	Austria de	non-profit-organizations SilverStripe	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gemeinwohlprojekte.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Crowdfunding für Gemeinwohl: gemeinwohlprojekte.at	Austria de	non-profit-organizations TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quifd.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Quifd	de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindestlohn.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Mindestlöhne - Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut	de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pro-spe.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Pro Spe - pro-spe.at	Austria de	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wikimedia.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Wikimedia Deutschland - Wissen muss frei zugänglich sein!	Germany de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
twingle.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Spendenformular - twingle	Germany de	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pronpo.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	proNPO – Die Fundraisingagentur	Austria de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.