similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to fteccher.com

Fteccher alternatives & similar sites

Franklin Tucker Eccher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aaronswright.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Aaron Sidney Wright, PhD	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abolitionseminar.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Abolition Seminar \| An educational tool for teachers, students, and all who fight for freedom	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediahistorydivision.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The History Division \| AEJMC	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melbournehistoryworkshop.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Melbourne History Workshop	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melinda-baldwin.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Melinda Baldwin	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melissaterras.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Professor Melissa Terras MBE FReng \| Adventures in Digital Cultural Heritage	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melrosestories.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	(Dis)Placed Urban Histories: Melrose	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
memory-responsibility.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	From Memory to Responsibility: Major History Project	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
archaeolink.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	lesson plans and other reviewed resources for classes	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csudigitalhumanities.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Center for Public History + Digital Humanities at Cleveland State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cthistorycenter.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Connecticut Center for History & Civic Learning	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lafloridaheroes.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Heroes of La Florida Curriculum Project	en	education Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landliteracylegacy.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Land Literacy and Legacy: Cultivating Knowledge For Future Generations	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laracampbell.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Lara Campbell \| Historian \| Gender, Women, 20th Century Canada	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
latinjosephus.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Latin Josephus	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laurabrannanfretwell.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Laura Brannan Fretwell – History PhD Candidate	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningaboutamericanhistory.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Learning About American History _________________________________ - African American History	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaihs.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	AAIHS - African American Intellectual History Society	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.