similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to friendsofrich.com

Friendsofrich alternatives & similar sites

Friends of Rich — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Law →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
richardharrislaw.com ↗	70 match shared topic	Personal Injury Attorneys Las Vegas, NV \| Richard Harris Law Firm	United States~ en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ftc.gov ↗	55 match shared topic	Federal Trade Commission \| Protecting America's Consumers	en	law Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ico.org.uk ↗	55 match shared topic	Information Commissioner's Office	United Kingdom en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uspto.gov ↗	55 match shared topic	United States Patent and Trademark Office	en	law Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uscourts.gov ↗	55 match shared topic	United States Courts	en	law Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
justice.gov ↗	55 match shared topic	Department of Justice \| Homepage \| United States Department of Justice	en	law Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gdpr-info.eu ↗	55 match shared topic	General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Legal Text	European Union en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naela.org ↗	55 match shared topic	National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys Home NAELA	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arizonacontractorauthority.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Arizona Contractor Authority \| Arizona Contractor	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 16
opendatacommons.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Home — Open Data Commons: legal tools for open data	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
supremecourt.gov ↗	55 match shared topic	Home - Supreme Court of the United States	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agediscrimination.info ↗	55 match shared topic	Everything age discrimination	en	law Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
efeldmanlaw.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Elliott Feldman Law Group \|	en	law WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
connecticutcontractorauthority.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Connecticut Contractor Authority \| Connecticut Contractor	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 16
legal-form.org ↗	55 match shared topic	General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Legal Text	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
milliondollaradvocates.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Million Dollar Advocates Forum - Home	en	law phpBB	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicnoticeportal.uk ↗	55 match shared topic	Public Notice Portal	United Kingdom en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
justice.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Home \| AAJ	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.