similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to fplus2019.com

Fplus2019 alternatives & similar sites

fplus – 食を変え　習慣を変え　子供たちに誇れる暮らしを — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Nutrition →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ajinomoto.co.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	味の素株式会社～Eat Well, Live Well.～	Japan ja	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imakara.style ↗	55 match shared topic	イマカラ｜今からダイエット食事－管理栄養士監修	ja	nutrition WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
yakult.co.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	ヤクルト本社	Japan ja	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
j-milk.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	一般社団法人Ｊミルク Japan Dairy Association （J-milk） \| Ｊミルクは、みなさんの食生活の向上と酪農・乳業の発展を目的とした団体です。	Japan ja	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
grip-likeme.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Like Me	ja	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jhnfa.org ↗	55 match shared topic	公益財団法人日本健康・栄養食品協会	ja	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pocarisweat.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	ポカリスエット公式サイト｜大塚製薬	Japan ja	non-alcoholic-beverages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
orthomolecular.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	一般社団法人オーソモレキュラー栄養医学研究所	Japan ja	nutrition WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
e-classa.net ↗	18 match shared topic	Healthy Life Club	ja	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tanita.co.jp ↗	18 match shared topic	TANITA \| タニタ	Japan ja	healthy-living	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alinequissak.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Home Page - Aline Quissak \| Nutritionist, Health & Wellness Expert	en	nutrition WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eatright.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: eatright.org	en	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dge.de ↗	55 match shared topic	DGE - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung e.V. \| DGE	Germany de	nutrition TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
levels.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Levels \| See how food affects your health	en	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livsmedelsverket.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Livsmedelsverket	Sweden sv	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbgbekasikota.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Badan MBG Kabupaten Bekasi \| Layanan Unggulan untuk Masa Depan Sehat Indonesia	en	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mbgbandungkab.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Badan MBG Kabupaten Bandung \| Layanan Unggulan untuk Masa Depan Sehat Indonesia	en	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mbgbandungbaratkab.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Badan MBG Kabupaten Bandung Barat \| Layanan Unggulan untuk Masa Depan Sehat Indonesia	en	nutrition	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.