similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to fplonka.dev

Fplonka alternatives & similar sites

filip płonka's home page — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kera.name ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Tom Lachecki	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moty.net ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Piotr Motykiewicz moty.net	pl	technology-and-computing Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simon-fortelny.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Simon Fortelny	pl	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skylinelabs.tech ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Skyline Labs - Inżynieria Oprogramowania & Mentoring	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronparecki.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Parecki	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
morzel.net ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Blog programistyczny Miłosza Orła	pl	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xbolt.dev ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	0xBolt — plate	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronpk.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Parecki	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giganciprogramowania.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Giganci Programowania	pl	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
retrorocketnetwork.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	iMagazine \| Technologia, lifestyle, podróże i sztuka	pl	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
monibu.org ↗	21 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Stuff I want to remember - tips & tricks, links etc.	pl	computing Grav	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aiready.guru ↗	21 match 1 shared topics	AI Ready — Społeczność Twórców AI, Nocode i Automatyzacji	pl	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-propo.com ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	Apropo.io - IT Project Estimation & Proposal Automation \| CPQ for Software Houses	pl	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kacperacy.ovh ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	Kacper Maciołek - .NET Developer	pl	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
kaspiotr.pro ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	Piotr Kasprzyk	pl	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kazik.space ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	mlodykazik	pl	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
virtas.tech ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	Virtas Tech - Agencja programistyczna	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vizi-tech.click ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	BWTF App	pl	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.